|
||||
|
||||
| introduction |
Gita Hashemi |
Sep 10, 2003 07:54 PDT |
||
| greetings. gita hashemi: artist, writer, educator, toronto-based recent collaborative endeavours: http://negotiations2003.net http://olivefair.net http://creativeresponseweb.net http://wordroom.net from an upcoming article in fuse magazine: "We started this project [[Negotiations: From a Piece of Land to a Land of Peace]] a year ago from the conclusion that neither the sloganeering of trendy anti-· [fill-in the blank] movements, nor the ambivalence of intellectual ironicism [irony + cynicism] nor their attendant conceptual paradigms and creative practices were adequate responses given the urgency of the conditions here in North America as in Palestine-Israel. The rise of renewed fascism to state power in the United States - the world's military capital - coupled with the resurgence of militarist colonialism the world over - both readily justified through discourses of "democracy," "free trade," "security," and "anti-terrorism" - necessitate that we substantiate our critical deconstructive strategies with constructive social exchange towards building and strengthening heterogeneous [not "pluralist"] and accountable networks of resistance and solidarity. Such networks are crucial to the formation and fortification of the collective will to dissent from the given and move towards the envisioned, from preaching "peace" prosaically as the abstract absence of conflict to working through our geopolitical, social, economic and historical differences and power asymmetries towards building the necessary conditions for a just peace. To this effect, we made the notions of collaborating across "divides" (national, cultural, political, disciplinary) and public participation central to our curatorial concepts and integral in our programming approaches, reasoning that only in the space of shared labour could meaningful negotiations take place, and that art, as a medium of communication and imagination, could not only mediate such social dialogue but also facilitate broader participation in it. Negotiations brought to Toronto a wide range of collaborative projects and programmes by cultural producers of different backgrounds and belongings. Most of these drew on public participation in their creative processes and/or creatively capitalized on the collaborative nature of dissemination space to actively engage the audiences in the issues they raised. In our own work, we conversed and collaborated with diverse individuals and groups in anti-racist, feminist, indigenous rights, union and social justice movements; and consciously built in our programme multiple platforms - post-screening discussions, panels, workshops and a public forum - for presenter-audience as well as presenter-presenter dialogue. The totality of this space of shared labour was where differing political claims and social visions were problematized and negotiated, openly, collectively and transparently. Inevitably, these negotiations led to new understandings, relations and networks, thus manifesting the "use value" of artistic engagement as visionary social construction. This, to us, was the topmost measure of Negotiations' viability. " on cultural resistance: http://negotiations2003.net/will/statement.html http://negotiations2003.net/statement.html the conference you're planning is of great interest to me as i am currently thinking and working through _ethics_ of collaboration. be well. gita |
||||
|
||||