|
||||
|
||||
also online and off + new member |
Sarah Cook |
Jan 15, 2004 18:16 PST |
||
| Hello freecooperators, I've been a member of the list since nearly the beginning, but only occasionally read the posts and apologise for not posting an introduction until now.... I have been completing my PhD dissertation for the University of Sunderland (UK) in practice, as a new media curator. My thesis explores models of curatorial practice in response to new media art... and seeing as collaboration is one of the defining characteristics of new media art (in both its production and distribution), it figures prominently in my discussion of curating (both in an out of the institution, both on and offline). Projects I have been involved with recently (as a curator or theorist) which gave me time to think about collaboration and participate in collaborations include: The Art For Networks exhibition, curated by artist Simon Pope: www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/artfornetworks The Bridges Symposium at the Banff Centre for the Arts: www.banffcentre.ca/bnmi/bridges The launch of Jonah Brucker-Cohen and Tim Redfern's simpleTEXT: www.simpleTEXT.info and my work with artists Jon Winet and Margaret Crane, such as the piece I commissioned, Monument: www.locusplus.org.uk/monument In the UK I have been tracking some new media artist collectives who use re-enactment as an artistic strategy and use technologies of real-time (or real-time as a technology!) to document and provide access to their work (Nina Pope and Karen Guthrie: www.somewhere.org.uk; Rod Dickinson: www.jonestownreenactment.org and www.milgramreenactment.org; Kris Cohen and Ben Coode-Adams: www.issomeonecomingtogetme.blogspot.com; Jeremy Deller; Marcus Coates). Following from some of what Charles Green has written in the Third Hand, I have been discussing with these artists how technology facilitates or camouflages their collaborations, who exactly the audience is in re-enactment projects and how those audiences change based on whether they access the project by collaborating in its making or by use of a technology. Naturally, as a curator I'm interested in how these works can be represented in gallery contexts also. I look forward to more time spent reading and responding to the list after my defense! Sarah ********* Sarah Cook, curator and co-editor CRUMB: The Curatorial Resource for Upstart Media Bliss www.newmedia.sunderland.ac.uk/crumb www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/new-media-curating.html |
||||
|
||||