|
||||
|
||||
RE: Diffusion: Collaborative Practice in
|
Gregory G. Sholette |
Dec 07, 2003 13:55 PST |
||
| dear list: I agree with Grant: explain this ominous insinuation. And, if I can recommend an interesting and unexpected analysis of the relationship of the Soviet vanguard and Stalin see: Boris Groys, "Stalinism as an Aesthetic Phenomenon," in Tekstura: Russian Essays on Visual Culture, edited and translated by Alla Efimova and Lev Manovich, (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1993), pp 115 - 151. Groys suggests that it was the far reaching ambition of the avant-garde that made it a target of Stalin. Specifically, the Constructivists, Productivists and Engineerists in particular were suppressed because of their overtly expressed desire to create a new society that was 1. organized along the lines of their own, radical art practice and 2. in which art as a unique profession dissolved into the masses and into daily life. However, this is hardly a formula for some lock-step cabal leading the sheepish masses and backed up by terror and follows along the lines proposed by the young marx and engles in the German Ideology: "The exclusive concentration of artistic talent in particular individuals, and its suppression in the broad mass which is bound up with this, is a consequence of division of labour. ... In a communist society there are no painters but only people who engage in painting among other activities." - g. sholette -- ___________________________________________________________ There must be interference, crossing of borders and obstacles, a determined attempt to generalize exactly at those points where generalizations seem impossible to make---we need to think about breaking out of the disciplinary ghettos in which as intellectuals we have been confined, to reopen the blocked social processes ceding objective representation (hence power) of the world to a small coterie of experts and their clients, to consider that the audience for literacy is not a closed circle of three thousand professional critics but the community of human beings living in society, and to regard social reality in a secular rather than a mystical mode, despite all the protestations about realism and objectivity. Edward Said gregory g. sholette gshol-*at*artic.edu http://www.artic.edu/~gshole/ |
||||
|
||||